WE CANT! US Security Refuses To Protect Harry After Calling Them Useless And Downgrading Them
Prince Harry Faces Security Trouble in the US After Controversial Comments
Prince Harry, once a full-time working member of the British royal family, has faced several challenges since relocating to the United States. One of the most serious and recent issues involves his security arrangements — or lack thereof. Reports have emerged suggesting that US security services have refused to provide him protection following his negative remarks about their performance and status. This latest development has added fuel to an already complex public and political debate surrounding the Duke of Sussex.
Since stepping down from royal duties in 2020 and moving to California with his wife, Meghan Markle, and their two children, Harry has been vocal about his concerns regarding safety. He has repeatedly emphasized the need for proper security, claiming his family continues to be under threat. However, instead of negotiating quietly, Harry is said to have criticized US protection services, allegedly calling them “useless” and “inferior” compared to British royal security forces. This public downgrade seems to have backfired.
According to sources close to the situation, American law enforcement and security officials have taken offense to Harry’s remarks. While he had originally hoped to receive the same level of protection that he once had in the UK — particularly during public appearances and international travel — that request was denied. The refusal became even firmer after his reported comments about the capabilities and professionalism of American protective services.
This standoff places Harry in a difficult position. Unlike in the UK, where he was entitled to royal protection due to his official role, in the US, such arrangements depend on the government or private contracts. Since he is no longer a working royal and is not a US citizen or government official, he is not entitled to government-funded protection. Private security is available, but it doesn’t offer the same legal authority, especially when dealing with international threats or public security zones.
The consequences are not just professional or legal — they’re also deeply personal. With two young children and frequent public appearances, the security question weighs heavily on Harry’s mind. Public events, charity work, and international engagements become more complicated without formal protection. At the same time, his comments have strained relationships with officials who might have otherwise been open to cooperation.
Critics argue that Harry brought this situation upon himself, suggesting that if he had approached the matter with more diplomacy and less criticism, he might have found a solution. Others believe he is being unfairly punished for expressing frustration about his family’s safety. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan have not made any recent public statements addressing the security controversy.
As this issue continues to unfold, it raises broader questions about the balance between public figures, personal safety, and political relations. For now, Prince Harry must rely on private security firms — and navigate a growing list of public and private challenges that come with life outside the royal institution.
